In the last two months, a world-renowned scientist and three nationally recognized engineers have called for a new investigation of 9/11, yet none of these has been reported in the mainstream media. These are in addition to hundreds of other respected engineers, professors, senior government officials, and more who had earlier seriously questioned the results of The 9/11 Commission Report, and whose profiles and statements can be found at http://patriotsquestion911.com.
Most recently, on Sept. 4th, Joel S. Hirschhorn, Ph.D., who served for 12 years as a Senior Staff Member of the Congressional Office of Technology Assessment and later as Director of Environment, Energy and Natural Resources for the National Governors Association, called for a new investigation of 9/11. Hirschhorn stated, "First, let the technical truth emerge. Then, if necessary, cope with the inevitable political, conspiracy and other questions." For an excellent article on this, click here.
On Aug. 27th, Lynn Margulis, Ph.D., member of the National Academy of Sciences and world renowned scientist, characterized the official account of 9/11 as "a fraud" and called for a new investigation. "I suggest that those of us aware and concerned demand that the glaringly erroneous official account of 9/11 be dismissed as a fraud and a new, thorough, and impartial investigation be undertaken." For more on this, click here.
An Aug. 21st article reported that James Quintiere, Ph.D., former Chief of NIST's Fire Science Division, called for an independent review of the World Trade Center Twin Tower collapse investigation. NIST is the National Institute of Standards and Technology which was tasked with researching the destruction of the towers on 9/11. "I wish that there would be a peer review of this," he said, referring to the NIST investigation. "I think all the records that NIST has assembled should be archived. I would really like to see someone else take a look at what they've done; both structurally and from a fire point of view. ... I think the official conclusion that NIST arrived at is questionable." For an eye-opening article on this, click here.
On July 16, J. Marx Ayres, former member of the National Institute of Sciences Building Safety Council called for a new investigation of 9/11, mentioning the work of Steven Jones, a former Brigham Young University physics professor. "Steven Jones call[ed] for a serious investigation of the hypothesis that the WTC 7 and the Twin Towers were brought down, not just by impact damage and fire, but through the use of pre-positioned 'cutter-charges.' [This] must be the rallying cry for all building design experts to speak out." For more on this, click here.
Additionally, this week, Commander Ralph Kolstad, U.S. Navy ‘Top Gun’ pilot, questioned the official account of 9/11 and called for a new investigation. "When one starts using his own mind, and not what one was told, there is very little to believe in the official story." Please click here for more.
Why has the mainstream media covered none of these stories? For an abundance of reliable, verifiable information demonstrating that we need a full and impartial investigation of 9/11, visit our 9/11 Information Center at http://www.WantToKnow.info/911information. Please help disseminate this critically important information and call for an impartial citizens' investigation of 9/11.
With best wishes,
Tod Fletcher and Fred Burks for PEERS and the WantToKnow.info Team
Former language interpreter for Presidents Bush and Clinton
P.S. Many thanks to Alan Miller of http://patriotsquestion911.com for providing most of this information.