The Truth will prevail, but only if we demand it from Congress!

9-11 Inside Job and Neocons Hacked 2004

SCROLL DOWN

Home ] 9-11 Inside Job ] Federal Reserve ] Hacking Elections ] Iraq War ] Fake War on Terror ] New World Order ] Media ] Peak Oil-Petro Euros ] Fascism in U.S. ] Editorials ] About Us ] Links ] Contact Us ]

 

Home
Up

COMPUTER FRAUD ARTICLE 16
 
 
16. Another Election Held and Another Election Stolen

While employed at Wong Enterprises, Congressman Feeney had
requested if Wong could write a voting program that could alter the
vote and be undetectable. As the technology advisor, I explained that
as long as the source code was provided and complied under
supervision, code which altered the vote and was undetectable could
not be built. Another problem would be that no one would trust a
program that provided for no paper trail to substantiate its
accuracy. When the vote was flipped the paper trail could easily
detect the fraud.

Another election held and another election s to len. In 2000 Bush s to le
the election by restricting the ability to vote by those people most
likely to vote against him. The abuses were wide spread and the
Democrats and other groups that believe in each individuals right to
vote put to gether an impressive attempt to make sure that every
individual that wanted to vote would not be turned away. Everywhere
you went there was booths where new voters could register.
Celebrities in commercials were urging voters to get out and vote.
Poll watchers were placed in polling stations across the country to
guarantee that every voter would not be turned away on any
technicality.

What these well meaning groups failed to account for was that they
were defending the 2000 election fixing plan and not taking in to
account that this election would be decided not by voters but by the
rise of technology. Every one might be allowed to vote but their
vote, and your vote made no difference at all. The programmers had
already decided who would win and by how much.

Prior to this election I personally sent out information to the media
which should have been provided to the elec to rate. It was not. The
biggest turnout in his to ry had no chance to win this election or any
other unless the programmers of the voting machine allowed it. I
believe they will allow it less and less as the machines control the
elections and the Republicans control the machines.

This is not speculation. It is not a rant designed to make the losers feel better. 

I speak from first hand information and unless people stand up and act, 

democracy in this country is ended.

While employed at Wong Enterprises, Congressman Feeney had requested
if Wong could write a voting program that could alter the vote and be
undetectable. As the technology advisor, I explained that as long as
the source code was provided and complied under supervision, code
which altered the vote and was undetectable could not be built.
Another problem would be that no one would trust a program that
provided for no paper trail to substantiate its accuracy. When the
vote was flipped the paper trail could easily detect the fraud.

This request was early in my exposure to Congressman Feeney, so I was
not familiar with what a to tal piece of crap he truly was. My
assumption was that he was worried that the other side (the
Democrats) would introduce voting machines which could manipulate the
vote. Mrs. Wong volunteered that we (meaning me) could put to gether a
quick pro to type that he could view and show others.

I have recreated that pro to type and posted it at
http://www.justaflyonthewall.com/votefraudprogram.htm. It is
essentially the same code that I built for the vote fraud demo for
Congressman Feeney. You will notice that by clicking on the correct
hidden spots on the screen, the vote will flip so that the Republican
candidate will receive fifty one percent of the vote. The hot spots
make it possible to flip the vote as often as necessary yet it will
never fire accidentally so as to avoid detection. My pro to type was
actually very simplistic. The actual sequence to flip the vote could
be as complex as the programmer wished or even to operate
au to matically. In cases when the Republican is already leading, the
vote is left as is. I built the program to demonstrate that with
proper supervision that the election machines would be safe. The code
would not be able to be hidden.

The next day I complete the pro to type and presented it to Mrs. Wong.
I stressed how the tampering could be detected. She quickly set me
straight as the true intention. Her exact words were "If we can't
hide the manipulation, we won't get the contract the program is needed  

to control the south Florida vote." Another confirmation of
why I needed to get a different job. I would not build something that
would defraud every voter in this country. Even better, I knew that
as long as the election supervisors used proper computer procedures,
no one else would or could either.

What I did not anticipate was that this country would allow the
placement of voting machines where the source code was not provided.
The programs were pre-compiled (you have no idea what is in them or
what hidden triggers exist), and where no paper trail would be
required to check their accuracy. Any moron could build a voting
program that could flip the vote under those circumstances and no
amount of testing could discover the deception.

A reproduction of the pro to type I developed at Wong for Congressman
Feeney can be downloaded at
http://www.justaflyonthewall.com/votefraudprogram.htm. It also
includes the instructions for installing the program and manipulating
the voting. Under normal circumstances it will accurately record the
vote to tals. By clicking on the proper hidden triggers the vote is
manipulated and without a paper trail becomes altered in such a way
as to be untraceable.

A major question might be why. Why would the Republicans choose to
cheat? Vote fraud is by no means a new occurrence nor, is it confined
to one particular party. The first vote fraud was very likely not far
behind the first election ever held. The people who run and many of
those who support them have a vested interest in making sure that
their candidate wins. It's about policy. It's about ideology. Mostly,
it's about the money. By simply placing the proper technology in
place they have assured vic to ry in perpetuity. Each of their
victories will weaken any opposition parties. You can already see it
happening.

The Democrats have already started looking inward and pointing
fingers at each other in order to explain a loss that was not
possible. This is precisely what the Republicans expected. Exactly
what occurred when Bush s to le the 2000 election. The fighting and the
finger pointing within the Democratic party does more to boost the
Republicans than anything the Republicans can ever do. As they grouse
about changing their message or their method of delivery, they
project a message to the public that their message is insincere.
Democrats need to believe what they believe. If that is what makes
them a minority party then so be it. Be true to yourself, your goals
and don't change the package just to impress the masses. Most
importantly make sure that the wins and losses are real and not just
manipulations by a side that will do anything to win.

Did Bush win? Bush could not have won. Take Florida or Ohio . A switch
of either would change the outcome. In reality Bush probably lost
both. There have been many reports of people being registered as
Republicans without their knowledge. Even with these inflated figures
in Florida alone the Democrats out number the Republicans by over a
half million votes. The exit polling, where voters are surveyed at
the polling place immediately after voting, showed Kerry ahead by as
much as nine percent in Florida . In Ohio the exit polling showed
Kerry with a 60 to 40 lead. At the same time the actual vote
continued to hover at the 51 to 49 margin in favor of Bush. We must
assume that either the voters consistently lied to the surveyors or
the vote was flipped. Even more telling was the extremely small
margin of vic to ry in the south Florida counties. The very counties
that Mrs. Wong had to ld me were the ones that the vote fraud program
was intended to control.

This was not an election where people were not strongly committed.
The massive turnout and the new registration of voters were at an all
time high. Even more important the Democrats were at the forefront.
An Associated Press s to ry less than a month before the election
showed that the Democrats had registered more voters in the swing
states such as Arizona , Iowa , New Mexico and New Hampshire .

Most important was the fact that everyone who viewed themselves as a
Democrat was highly committed to voting Democratic. I personally did
not meet a single person who said they were normally Democratic but
were changing their vote this year.

Conversely, I spoke with several pre-Bush Republicans that were not
only voting for the Democrats candidates but actively volunteering
their time to help campaign for the Democrats. So in a highly
polarized election where the Democrats outnumbered the Republicans in
the swing states by several million votes, and the exit poll
consistently demonstrated a Democratic lead, the Republicans still
won. Who actually believes that?

What can we do about it? Not only has another election been s to len
but our democracy is now gone. The machines decide, not the voters.
First and foremost, we must insist that the machine be replaced by
machines that can be verified vote for vote. Integrity of the vote is
paramount to democracy. The breakdown of trust in the system will rob
this country of any legitimacy. We must force out of office any
Republicans that have been benefited by this betrayal.

Now if we were still in the mindset of the 1960's the answer would be
protest marches, personal attacks on Bush supporters, and destruction
of government buildings. This has never been an approach that appeals
to me. We can fix the problems without such aggressive tactics. We do
however, have to make some noise. I believe we can do so through
economic boycott and the recall of questionable election results. In
areas where the machines that were used could not be validated or any
other place where there is a possibility that the vote was
manipulated, we need to begin recalls of any Republicans that came
in to office under questionable conditions. In cases where the recalls
occur we need to insist that we use paper ballots and then report our
votes to an non-partisan reporting group. Through these measures we
can force them to replace the suspect machines with verifiable
machines. If they fail to respond, we can simple recall the offenders
until the machines are replaced. Cost is not a fac to r. I personally
will provide a program free of charge to any election official that
will electronically tabulate votes. It will be able to run on any
standard computer. In fact, I am sure there are a thousand other
programmers that would donate their time to provide code that would
be publicly viewable, able to be compiled under non-partisan
supervision, and provide a verifiable paper trail and receipt of
voting. In effect, absolutely no cost to guarantee that each vote is
counted correctly.

Besides just a recall of the suspect politicians, we can do even
more. We can take away their dollars. The to p supporters of Bush must
be attacked. Now I'm not talking about burning their buildings or
assaulting their executives. I am proposing a boycott of their
products. In America we have many choices on which products we buy.
Now that our freedom to select leaders has been circumvented we must
employ the tactic that won in the battle for civil rights. Blacks
voting rights were being infringed such that they had no political
power. Even their economic power was fairly weak, but by boycotting
those that supported discrimination they were able to force change.

By contrast our voting rights have been removed and replaced by a
poorly disguised shell game. We do, however, control seventy plus
percent of the economic power of this country. Following is a list of
products that we need to avoid. By not purchasing the products of
Bush supporters we can hit Bush where he will feel it most. Several
of the products I prefer over the alternative choices but minor
inconveniences are a small price to pay for getting our country back.

It is as simple as switching from Coca-Cola to Pepsi, changing your
insurance company from Blue Cross, AFLAC, or American International
Group to a neutral insurance company. On trips to Vegas, Biloxi or
Detroit ; choose accommodations not connected to MGM Mirage. If you
have a credit card by MBNA or Bank of America just transfer the
balance to a new non-Bush card. If you usually buy your gasoline, at
two dollars plus a gallon, at Chevron or Texaco, just drive an extra
block or two to someone else's brand. Did you know the United Parcel
Service is a big Bush donor. Use Fed-Ex or the Post office. Keep your
money out of the pockets of those that are working against us.


Take away their ability to support Bush's efforts to take away your
right to vote. A complete list of the big Bush backers can be found
at http://www.justaflyonthewall.com/bushbackers.html . If you know of
any others please write me at JustAFlyOnTheWall@h... and I
will post those also.

We can take this country back and res to re the voting rights to the
people. We can overcome this "Rise of the Machines". While presently
your vote may not count in the voting booth, every dollar you take
from the Bush supporters and spend elsewhere is a vote for freedom.
With the fall of the Bush supporters will come a call to correct the
voting fraud.

Never has there been a more important decision to make. Never has
there been a more important cause to pursue. I believe that we can
succeed.

To Download the Vote Fraud Program Click on the Link Below.

http://www.justaflyonthewall.com/votefraudprogram.htm